What is the ACLAS honorary nomination and application process?

The process is Submit, Review, Evaluation, Decision, and Recognition. Submission does not guarantee recognition, and all applications and nominations are subject to review.

Which honorary recognitions can be requested?

The form supports requests for Honorary Doctorate review and Honorary Professorship review.

What supporting evidence is requested?

Applicants or nominators may provide a CV, professional profile, institutional profile, publication profile, official award record, or other credible public documentation.

Office of Academic Recognition

Honorary Nomination & Application

Submit a formal application or nomination for a distinguished scholar, educator, public leader, or professional whose record of achievement and service merits honorary academic consideration by ACLAS.

Submit
Review
Evaluation
Decision
Recognition

Submission does not guarantee recognition. All applications and nominations are subject to review.

* Required fields

JavaScript is disabled. You can still complete and submit the full form below; the step-by-step helper and live word counts will not be available.

Swipe to view all steps

Recognition requested and submission type

Select the recognition requested for review and identify the source of the materials.

Recognition requested *

Submission type *

Self-submission Use this if you are submitting your own materials for consideration. Third-party nomination Use this to nominate a professor, scholar, leader, or professional. Institutional referral Use this if the nomination is submitted by a university, association, company, or organization.

Personal Information

Provide enough information for ACLAS to verify the nominee's identity, current role, and public professional profile.

Full name * Preferred display name Nominee email address If nominating someone else, provide this only if appropriate and available. Phone or mobile contact Country or region * City Current position and institution * Primary field * Highest academic degree Academic or professional title

Distinction and institutional fit

Summarize the nominee's record of achievement, contribution to society or profession, and potential connection to ACLAS academic life.

Nominee biography and principal achievements * Required 80-300 words. 0 words Years of professional / academic experience Number of publications / books Nomination rationale and ACLAS alignment Optional, but if provided must be 40-180 words. 0 words Selected publications, books, research, or major works Awards, honors, media features, or public recognition Potential contribution to ACLAS Leadership, institutional, or public contribution

Supporting evidence and documentation

Please provide credible supporting evidence such as a CV, institutional profile, publication profile, official award record, or equivalent public documentation.

At least one supporting material is required. Upload a CV or provide one credible public evidence link/list.

Privacy note. CVs, profile documents, and portrait photos are used for ACLAS review and follow-up. Uploads are stored in a private review bucket and are not public by default.

See ACLAS Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

Primary evidence type Primary evidence URL * Required unless you upload a CV or provide evidence notes below. Google Scholar ORCID ResearchGate or academic profile Additional public profile Additional evidence notes or links * Required unless you provide a primary evidence URL or upload a CV. Upload CV, resume, or profile PDF * PDF, DOC, or DOCX up to 10MB. Required unless you provide a primary evidence URL or evidence notes. Optional professional portrait Optional. Professional headshot for possible website or announcement use, up to 5MB.

Nominator contact information

If you are nominating someone else, your name, email, organization, and relationship to the nominee support responsible follow-up.

Your name Your email Your organization Relationship to nominee Additional notes

Declaration and authorization

Confirm the accuracy of the submitted information and acknowledge ACLAS review and recordkeeping policies.

Privacy and file handling. ACLAS will review the submitted information for academic engagement follow-up. Uploaded files are stored for review access and are not public by default. ACLAS may contact the submitter, and may contact the nominee if appropriate and lawful.

See ACLAS Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.